The Economic Policy Institute and TCF hosted a panel discussion on concentrated poverty with TCF fellow Paul Jargowsky, Patrick Sharkey of NYU, Ta-Nehisi Coates of The Atlantic, and Sherrilyn Ifill of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. EPI Research Associate Richard Rothstein moderated.
Watch the video from the panel below.
More about the event at EPI's site.
As these debates remind us, we are all to some extent rendered parochial by our race and our class positions, and by other things, too. Age and family responsibilities provide obvious sources of difference. Disability status does, as well. I hate blunderbuss labels such as “black activist” or “white liberal,” which flatten out so much human granularity.
Read the full piece here.
It’s that time of year again. You might be thinking tax season, and technically you’d be right. However, there’s another important date to circle in April: Equal Pay Day. Every April 8, the conversation about equal-pay-for-equal-work starts up again--but this year, Washington may finally take action.READ MORE
In a report published this month in the Journal of Public Policy Analysis and Management, sociologist Stefanie DeLuca of the Johns Hopkins University said the Baltimore Mobility Program succeeded while so many others failed because it gave families not only the financial support to move, but the chance to experience life in a safe, quiet, diverse place with good schools and quality homes.
Through the Baltimore Housing Mobility Program more than 2,400 African American families have voluntarily moved to quality housing in mixed-income neighborhoods with low poverty rates, quality schools and access to employment and increased quality of life.
Read the full article here.
The case, known as Halbig v. Sebelius, is now before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, where a three-judge could still reverse Friedman’s ruling. And as University of Chicago health policy analyst Harold Pollack shows in a recent blog post, the exchanges would quickly collapse if that happened. The 87% of exchange participants now receiving federal financial assistance would lose it, making even the lowest level of marketplace coverage unaffordable. That would effectively nullify the individual mandate (the government can’t require people to buy coverage beyond their means) — and the loss of enrollees would push individual insurance rates into the stratosphere.
“I trust that no court would be reckless enough to wreak such havoc on such a flimsy basis,” Pollack writes. “Yet … you never know what might happen within a judicial system that is, itself, conspicuously polarized on ideological lines.”
Read more at MSNBC.
Compared to other advanced nations, America’s retirement security and health care systems offer weaker protections against risks we all face. The Century Foundation’s work focuses on ideas for strengthening Social Security, pensions, and health care – including steps for building on the Affordable Care Act.
Sign up for our mailing list and stay up to date on the latest happenings at The Century Foundation