The Century Foundation
Rethinking the Patriot Act: A New Report from the Century Foundation Provides Context for the Current Reauthorization Debate
6/9/2005

Contact:
Christy Hicks, 212-452-7723

Rethinking the Patriot Act: A New Report from the Century Foundation Provides Context for the Current Reauthorization Debate

New York City, June 9, 2005 —One of the most controversial and possibly one of the most misunderstood laws Congress has ever enacted, the USA Patriot Act remains at the forefront of public debate about security and civil liberties. For many Americans, it is synonymous with an egregious and unjustifiable suspension of the Bill of Rights. Others, troubled but more cautious, identify the Patriot Act with the grant of unprecedented powers that put civil liberties at some risk. Many who reject these concerns nonetheless accept their underlying assumption-that the Patriot Act does indeed give the federal government a package of powerful new search and surveillance tools.

As Congress considers whether to extend or expand several provisions of the Patriot Act, law professor Stephen J. Schulhofer has written a report for The Century Foundation that provides a context for that reexamination. In Rethinking the Patriot Act: Keeping America Safe and Free, Schulhofer explains the act's most important provisions and reviews the best information currently available to gauge their usefulness and their effects in practice. Contrary to conventional wisdom, Schulhofer argues, much of the Patriot Act was essential, and some of it, if not essential, was reasonably defensible. In fact, the act includes provisions-seldom noticed-that add new protections for certain civil liberties, extend new benefits to certain immigrant groups, and provide new remedies for violations of individual rights. Nonetheless, Schulhofer concludes, many of the act's new powers are far too broad, and even where the case for broad powers is strong, they were typically conferred with little effort to assure transparency and accountability.

"Whatever its defects, the Patriot Act is more complex and more protective of basic liberty than many of its detractors acknowledge," said Schulhofer. "The flaws however are basic. They threaten fundamental liberties, needlessly expand dangerous powers, and in practice interfere with effective measures to thwart terrorism. We can and must do better," he added.

Schulhofer concludes in the report that going forward, any changes to the Patriot Act should follow two rules. First, in responding to extraordinary threats to our security, we must ensure that the extraordinary powers we grant are narrowly tailored. Second, we must take care to guarantee maximum feasible accountability. He writes that secrecy and the absence of accountability are troublesome not just because they risk unnecessary invasions of liberty and privacy, but also because they are a recipe for wasted effort, misdirected resources, and misuse of legitimately acquired information for illegitimate purposes. Noting that our government's current acceptance of secrecy and unchecked law enforcement power sows alienation and mistrust, Schulhofer points out that our security depends on building confidence here and around the globe, not only that American is strong, but that American is fair, a society in which our government practices what it preaches in terms of human rights, treats all people with decency, and respects the rule of law.

Stephen J. Schulhofer is the Robert B. McKay Professor of Law at New York University Law School. From 1986 until 2000, he was director of the Center for Studies in Criminal Justice at the University of Chicago, where he was the Julius Kreeger Professor of Law, and he served for many years as a consultant to the United States Sentencing Commission. He is the author of The Enemy Within: Intelligence Gathering, Law Enforcement, and Civil Liberties in the Wake of September 11 (The Century Foundation Press, 2002).

This report is part of The Century Foundation's Homeland security Project, which is aimed at informing the public and the policy-making community about the complex challenges reated to preventing and responding to domestic terrorism. The Homeland Security Project is chaired by Thomas Kean former governor of New Jersey and 9/11 Commission chair, and Richard Celeste, former U.S. Ambassador and governor of Ohio. The project has received generous support from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Carnegie Corporation. More information on the project is available at www.tcf.org and www.homelandsec.org.

The Century Foundation conducts public policy research and analyses of economic, social, and foreign policy issues, including inequality, retirement security, election reform, media studies, homeland security, and international affairs. The foundation produces books, reports, and other publications, convenes task forces, and working groups and operates seven informational Web sites. With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., The Century Foundation is nonprofit and nonpartisan and was founded in 1919 by Edward A. Filene.

For more information or media copies of the report, contact Christy Hicks at hicks@tcf.org or (212) 452-7723.

Rethinking the Patriot Act: Keeping America Safe and Free
By Stephen J. Schulhofer
The Century Foundation Press
ISBN: 0-87078-495-1; 163 pages, paper

To Order: 1-800-552-5450
In Washington, D.C.: 202-797-6258

# # #