Economics & Inequality
Retirement Security
Education
Health Care
Homeland Security
Election Reform
Media & Politics
International Affairs


Taking Note
Health Policy Watch
Health Beat Blog by Maggie Mahar
insideIran.org
The Fiscal High Road
Equality & Education
The Federal Election Reform Network
Prospects for Peace
Caravan Books
The Social Security Network


Donate to TCF
Join our Listserv
 Taking Note
Home About TCF News Room Join our Listserv
News & Commentary
Afghanistan: A Year of Peaks and Valleys     Email    Printer-Friendly
Carl Robichaud, The Century Foundation, 12/31/2005

This year has been a turbulent one for Afghanistan, with both historic progress and daunting setbacks.

  • On the positive side, the country’s convened an elected parliament for the first time since 1973, its first female governor took office, and economic growth remained strong. Afghans remain optimistic about their future: according to a recent ABC News poll, 77 percent of Afghans believe their country is headed in the right direction (versus only 30 percent of Americans who feel the same way about their country). The majority of Afghans report better living conditions (85 percent) and improved freedom (80 percent) compared to the Taliban era.
  • Yet Afghanistan took steps backward in several sectors, and fulfilling these expectations will be difficult.

    State building
    . Efforts to fight corruption have stagnated and efforts to strengthen the state, especially in the provinces, have had mixed success. The country ranks among the world’s poorest, and the government is incapable of providing even basic security or services—even with a billion dollars in international aid. As donor fatigue sets in, Afghanistan’s window of opportunity closed another inch this year.

    Security. The re-emergence of the Taliban made this the bloodiest year since 2001, and the insurgency’s increased efficiency and brutality showed the influence of Iraqi tactics. Even if the Taliban never again become players on the national stage, their attacks, and those of foreign jihadists, raise the costs and complexity of development efforts.

    Human rights . The United States came under fire this year for several troubling scandals. In March, M. Cherif Bassiouni, the United Nations independent expert on human rights in Afghanistan , concluded a year of research with a report that identified “arbitrary arrest, illegal detentions and abuses committed by the United States-led Coalition forces.” Long before Condoleezza Rice faced accusations over U.S. secret prisons in Europe , Dana Priest revealed alleged human rights violations in 2002 and 2003 at the “Salt Pit,” a U.S.-sponsored detention facility in Afghanistan . In mid-October, U.S. forces burned the corpses of two Taliban fighters and used them to taunt insurgents. While America’s image is still positive among Afghans, with 83 percent favorable toward the United States , almost a third (30 percent) now report that attacks on U.S. military forces could be justified.

A closer look at the best and worst moments of 2005:

Security

Highlight

Low point

NATO agrees to a larger role: NATO finally agreed to take a more assertive role in Afghanistan, expanding its operations next year to the southern provinces and adding an extra 6,000 soldiers. NATO currently deploys 9,000 troops in Afghanistan, the vast majority of them in low-conflict regions. While the exact mandate of the new forces remains unclear—these will be peacekeepers operating in areas where peace is not established—it’s an encouraging sign of burden-sharing and should provide much-needed security to Afghan civilians.

Suicide bombing in Kandahar: A June 1 bomb in a Kandahar mosque that killed 19 and injured 52, mostly civilians, was the most lethal in a wave of almost twenty suicide attacks this year. There is evidence, direct and anecdotal, that indigenous Taliban and foreign insurgents have imported the tactics of Iraq into Afghanistan , a country where suicide attacks were once rare.

Afghan security : Because the U.S. military remains focused on counterterrorism, security has not dramatically improved for Afghan civilians, who continue to face coercion from militia leaders, strongmen, and drug lords.


Governance and Rule of Law

Highlight

Low point

Parliamentary Elections: The Afghan people made their voices heard at the polls, with 6.8 of 12 million registered voters showing up to vote for the national assembly and provincial councils. The electoral process was flawed and there were indications that voters felt disempowered: almost half (46 percent) of Afghans believed there was voter fraud and participation was down by 30 percent in Kabul compared to last year’s presidential polls. Nevertheless, vote buying and intimidation were insufficient to deter optimism: three-quarters of Afghans report having faith in the new parliament.

Human rights abusers elected: The elections signaled the entry into official power of some of the country’s worst war criminals. A prime example is Abdul Rabb Rasoul Sayyaf, an eloquent former jihadi, who came just five votes short of becoming Chairman of the Wolesi Jirga. Sayyaf’s abuses have been extensively documented by Human Rights Watch. He is not alone, either: HRW estimates that 60 percent of the new representatives are linked to militias and many stand accused of abuses.

Will elected office transform these leaders and make them more accountable? It’s possible. But the first session of the assembly does not bode well: Malalai Joya, a female minister, was shouted down when she criticized human rights abusers in the parliament.


Economic growth

Highlight

Low point

IMF reports “strong” performance: A May IMF review described Afghanistan ’s progress: “Output continued to grow steadily. Core inflation remained limited. Money growth and fiscal revenue were in line with program projections. All structural benchmarks but one were met. This performance bodes well for the long-term course of the economy.” The IMF expects GDP to rise to 13 percent next year.

Inaugural Development Data Released: For the first time, the UNDP released an Afghan Human Development Report. This data is indispensable: in its absence, it is virtually impossible to plan effective interventions and measure progress.

Inefficiency of assistance: Afghanistan remains on life-support, and the model by which international aid is distributed remains fundamentally flawed. The result? A parallel public sector has emerged which causes inefficiencies and slows the development of the Afghan state. Currently, only 18 percent of foreign aid is channeled through the Government of Afghanistan, and high-profile contractor fiascos have shaken the faith of Afghans in the development process.


Narcotics

Highlight

Low point

Successful eradication in Nangahar: When the powerful Arsala clan decided to cooperate with the Afghan government in return for foreign aid, poppy production plummeted by 96% in Nangahar, the province which contains Jalalabad. This change almost singlehandedly cut Afghanistan’s poppy cultivation by 20 percent this year, and showed that with the right incentives, farmers will give up their illicit crops.

U.S. drops opium spraying plan: In January, after opposition from President Karzai, the United States gave up its ill-conceived plans to aerially spray Afghanistan’s poppy crop. Opium represents the half the Afghan economy and there is no feasible plan to replace it. In the current climate, eradication would be highly destabilizing and counterproductive. Unfortunately, the issue is not fully settled and could reemerge in 2006.

Failure to provide alternative livelihoods: In Nangahar, as in other regions, the international community failed to provide meaningful aid to farmers who gave up their only cash crop. As Barnett Rubin describes it, Afghans were enticed by roads, dams, electric power, and fertilizers; instead “USAID allocated $71 million to alternative livelihoods in Nangahar which means they gave $71 million dollars to two Washington-based consulting firms . . . they paid people to dig ditches they didn’t need and paid them $3 a day to do it. I have photographs of these activities, actually. This was not what people thought was coming.”

The U.N. narcotics office has already stated that it expects poppy cultivation to increase next year. It’s no surprise, given the broken promises to last year’s growers.


Counterterrorism

Highlight

Low point

Killing of Hamza Rabia: In December, an unmanned predator drone launched a missile which killed Hamza Rabia, a key Al Qaeda operative who may have ranked as high as number three in the global network.

Military success against the Taliban: The U.S.-led Coalition continues to defeat the Taliban in every engagement it fights. Yet long-term success or failure will hinge not on military success but on efforts to isolate insurgents, especially by cutting off support from Pakistan . The scope of recent fighting suggests that the Taliban and their allies have been able to replace their ranks and operate effectively even with the loss of over 200 fighters this year. So far, amnesty programs have had limited success.

Escape of four high-level al Qaeda operatives: In an embarrassing setback, four top terrorist suspects escaped from a U.S. detention facility in Bagram in July. The group included O mar al-Faruq, a Kuwaiti who headed operations in Southeast Asia and had been considered “one of the most important Qaeda figures ever captured by the United States.”

Increase in foreign jihadists in Afghanistan: More and more foreign fighters are appearing among the ranks of the insurgency, suggesting a failure to prevent the flow of arms, funds and militants across borders. The U.S. has not gained Pakistan ’s full cooperation in addressing the threat.

Carl Robichaud is a program officer at The Century Foundation.



Copyright 2010 The Century Foundation. Privacy Policy
NY Office: 41 East 70th Street—New York, New York—10021—Phone:212-535-4441—212-879-9197
DC Office: 1333 H Street, NW—10th Floor— Washington, D.C. 20005— Phone: 202-387-0400— Fax: 202-483-9430